
Islamic fundamentalists are seeding war in Sudan, Somalia, Sierra Leone, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Israel. Their preferred weapon is the suicide bomber. Military strategies in Iraq, Lebanon, and Afghanistan have largely failed. As long as the enemy can mobilize one unit, they survive the day. Other strategies like backing weak African governments or supporting coups have also failed. The only successful model we have for containment is Israel. The basic premise: treat every citizen like a terrorist.
The basic anomaly that military strategists have not been able to overcome is the asymmetrical battlefield, a battlefield with no lines. Here is a 2004 definition from USAF Brigadier General Stephen Goldfein:
"By definition, it is difficult to characterize this fight. We can predict some of its attributes:
• Fleeting and mobile targets • Difficult combat ID: red, blue and gray • Specific, strategic high-value "targets" • National Command Authority participation? • Wide range of terrain • Low collateral damage tolerance • Anti-access scenarios: political, geographic, and forces • Time-sensitive effects • Low and high technology: IED's to cruise missiles • Unpredictable time, place or tempo"
Source: http://www.dtic.mil
Take this list of battlefield attributes and apply it to any US city with more than 500,000 citizens. What kind of critical mass would it take to wreak havoc on all the State capitals in the US? If young college students are disillusioned to the point of mass murder, how hard will it be to recruit under the moral authority of Islam? They recruit the disenfranchised, the lonely, and the rejected. Prisons, drug rehab centers, and ghettos become a hotbed for discontent.
Israel has succeeded largely because of its ability to draw battle lines. The asymmetrical has been made symmetrical through actual physical barriers between Gaza and the West Bank. Israel is willing to put its freedoms and the freedoms of Palestinians behind concrete walls. This arrangement has proved exceedingly difficult for those that live in Gaza but work in Jerusalem or vice versa. Families have been cut in half and rancor has grown. To call this a success is heart breaking. It is a mere perpetuation of hatred and a delay of the inevitable. We are proving that we can't live together. This is our tragedy and freedom suffers.
If the goal is preserving our culture, then we will need similar resolve. We will have to find a national backbone that enforces border security and ends the flow of illegal aliens across our borders. If you know anything about Mexico's immigration policies, they are quite porous and abide the illegal longer than our own. South America will unleash a flow of disenfranchised peoples that have more in common with Arabs than Anglos.
On the flipside, globalization, free markets, and democracy are leading to the destruction of ethnicity. Whites are marrying browns, blacks, and Orientals. Languages are being lost at an alarming rate. The differences that divide are melting away. Ironically, we are condemned to unity.
Babel was the beginning of human division. From Babel to 0 CE the world saw an increase in the number of "people groups" or ethnicities. The peak of this division was in fact 0 CE. Since that time small ethnic groups have moved into cities to be absorbed into the populous. The prophet of 0 CE was Jesus Christ. He prayed, "and the glory which You gave Me I have given them, that they may be one just as We are one: I in them, and You in Me; that they may be made perfect in one, and that the world may know that You have sent Me, and have loved them as You have loved Me." Unity is the glory of God. Unity has been mandated by our Creator. Will we find the wisdom in this mandate or will we continue to destroy ourselves?
Once ethnic boundaries are destroyed only have and have not will remain. Perhaps this is why the church of 0-300 CE opted for communal living. Luke declares in The Acts of the Holy Spirit,
"Now the multitude of those who believed were of one heart and one soul; neither did anyone say that any of the things he possessed was his own, but they had all things in common."
Paul bears witness that, "For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise."
Next article will be a look into George Luis Borges fascinating tale, The Library of Babel. Tune in.
If young college students are disillusioned to the point of mass murder, how hard will it be to recruit under the moral authority of Islam?
You don't know very much about Islam, do you?
I know this article is more about globalization, but that one paragraph kinda bothered me. Islam is not out to recruit anyone, let alone "disillusioned people at the point of mass murder."
Yeah, ok. But you're talking about it in the context of disillusioned American students, and they are not being recruited. It comes off as more than a bit alarmist.
The black Islamic movement in america would be an example of recruitment among the marginalized.
Ah...ok. Farrakhan's Nation of Islam is to Islam as Phelp's Westboro Baptist Church is to Christianity...
Dennis, please read Allah is God. I really would like your feedback.
OK, will do.
On the flipside, globalization, free markets, and democracy are leading to the destruction of ethnicity. Whites are marrying browns, blacks, and Orientals. Languages are being lost at an alarming rate. The differences that divide are melting away. Ironically, we are condemned to unity.
I also think we underrate how fundamentally societies are changing. I met a Kenyan and Japanese couple. They live in...Fort Worth, TX. Every now and then they fly to Tokyo and every now and then they go home to Kenya...
thought provoking read. need to digest it a bit more before commenting. won't be easy to achieve that. warrants a clear head to do your piece justice.
Another insightful and thought-provoking piece from mbrennan. How do we define who and what we are? It seems that the divides are becoming less racial and more cultural - that is, not so much the ancient cultural divides but the divide between secularism and traditionalism which seems to cut through so many cultures in the East and the West. Asymmetrical warfare calls for asymmetrical (new and innovative) ways of thinking.
Asymetrical thinking is required. And I agree, it is cultural and less racial. Culture clashes are MUCH more damaging, dangerous, violent than racial clashes. If color, eye formation is the main difference between people, they get over it quickly if they have cultural similarities.
If no cultural similarities, that is when the trouble really starts.
Openess is essential, but that is the antithesis of current, fundamentalist Islamic thinking. In Saudia Arabia no churches are allowed, period. In Iran, they seek to stem the flow of information over the internet (same in China).
IMHO, the free flow of information and experience is what will, if anything can, alter the perceptions of people and culture.
But, will be tough going, frankly. And will not be without an enormous amount of bloodshed.
Well said, wmolaw. I have found that it is virtually impossible to "know" an entire culture, but I can get to know people ... one person at a time. The societies that allow for that in the most open way possible will be the ones that are ultimately the healthiest, in my opinion.
the free flow of information and experience is what will, if anything can, alter the perceptions of people and culture.
wmolaw - a very important point, therein lies the biggest ooportunity (also strongest challenge) to break through cultural roadblocks. I think you're spot on about cultural differences being far greater challenges to overcome than racial ones.
Modern communication links provide much greater opportunity for people from vastly different cultures, languages, perspectives and opinions to come together and talk through these kinds of forums. There will inevitably be heatd debate and flame wars. But there is also a much better opportunity to raise awareness across the spectrum and start to bridge cultural divides. As you suggest, there will be some 'collateral damage' as a consequence. But in the lond term, mankind should be much more culturally sensitive to the fellow person.
Good discussion thread.
And that sensitivity needs to be on the part of ALL participants in this mortal coil we call life. Not just on the part of the Western countries.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |